Device and method for transferring unbundled network elements between local exchange carriers

ABSTRACT

A method and apparatus for transferring service between local exchange carriers. The method includes connecting a second local exchange carrier switch to a first local exchange carrier distribution frame while a first local exchange carrier switch is connected to the first local exchange carrier distribution frame. The method also includes initiating a disconnection of the first local exchange carrier switch from the first local exchange carrier distribution frame.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is a continuation of pending U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 10/408,101, filed on Apr. 8, 2003, entitled “Deviceand Method for Transferring Unbundled Network Elements Between LocalExchange Carriers”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 09/901,111, filed on Jul. 10, 2001, issued on May 20, 2003 asU.S. Pat. No. 6,567,513, and entitled “Device and Method forTransferring Unbundled Network Elements Between Local ExchangeCarriers”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.09/056,769, filed on Apr. 8, 1998, issued on Oct. 9, 2001 as U.S. Pat.No. 6,301,351, and entitled “Device and Method for TransferringUnbundled Network Elements Between Local Exchange Carriers”, thedisclosures of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference intheir entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a device and method for switchingunbundled network elements (UNEs), and particularly the local loop, fromone local exchange carrier (LEC) to another competing local exchangecarrier. More particularly, the present invention relates totransferring local loops between different LECs without the need toschedule and/or coordinate the transfer.

2. Description of the Prior Art

A typical LEC arrangement is shown in FIG. 1. The LEC central office 500has a switch 506 with terminating office equipment on the distributionframe (DF) 508. The connection typically includes (1) a directconnection between switch 506 and its appropriate connection in theoffice equipment (OE) side of DF 508, (2) a cross-connect 520 passesthrough DF 508 (as shown by the dotted line) and connects to the cableand pair side of DF 508 at connection 510, and (3) a wire connectsconnection 510 of the cable and pair connector side of the DF 508 with asubscriber's telephone equipment. As known in the art, switch 506 doesnot communicate with the subscriber's telephone equipment unless crossconnect 520 connects switch 506 with connector 510.

Current FCC regulations require LECs to lease UNEs to other competingLECs. To conform with these regulations, a selling LEC must permit apurchasing LEC to access DF 508 at selling LEC central office 500.Accordingly, as shown in FIG. 2, before transfer, a purchasing LEC setsup its own off-site switch 530, and a point of interface 504 at sellingLEC central office 500. Purchasing LEC interface 504 has terminatingoffice equipment on the OE side of DF 508; however, the cross connect522 is “tied off”, i.e., wire 522 is not physically connected toconnector 510, such that purchasing LEC switch 530 cannot communicatewith the subscriber's telephone equipment.

The above “tie-off” is due to the limitation that the local loop canonly accommodate one switch at a time. Accordingly, to transfer service,a technician must physically disconnect cross connect 520 from connector510 of DF 508 to disconnect the selling LEC, and physically connectcross connect 522 to connector 510 to connect purchasing LEC switch 530(through interface 504).

Under FCC regulations, a subscriber's service can only be disconnectedfrom a switch for a limited time. As a result, the purchasing LEC mustset an appointment with the selling LEC for a frame attendant toreconnect the wires and transfer control of the local loop within thatallocated time.

This process requires a frame attendant to travel to DF 508 and bepresent at the scheduled time. In theory, the purchasing LEC willcommunicate with the frame attendant to indicate readiness for transfer.The frame attendant then unplugs cross connect 520 to disconnect sellingLEC switch 506 from the subscriber's telephone equipment, and plugscross connect 522 in to connect purchasing LEC switch 530, as shown inFIG. 3. The purchasing LEC then does the necessary work and tests toconfirm a proper connection. If complications prevent proper transferwithin the allotted time, the frame attendant unplugs cross connect 522to disconnect purchasing LEC switch 530 and re-plugs cross connect 520in to reconnect selling LEC switch 506 (essentially returning the systemto the orientation shown in FIG. 2). The purchasing LEC must then makeanother appointment to attempt transfer, and attempt to fix the problembefore that time.

As seen by the above, transfer between LECs is based on the availabilityof the frame attendant, as the frame attendant must be physicallypresent at the DF during the entire transfer period. This requiresconsiderable coordination between the frame attendant and the purchasingLEC, plus labor expenses for the frame attendant's time.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is accordingly an object of the present invention to overcome thedrawbacks of the prior art.

It is accordingly a further object of the invention to transfer controlof a local loop between LEC's without requiring the presence of, orincurring the expense associated with, a frame attendant.

It is accordingly a further object of the invention to provide thepurchasing LEC with greater control over the transfer of service.

According to an embodiment of the invention, there is provided a methodfor transferring service from a first local exchange carrier to a secondlocal exchange carrier. The first local exchange carrier connects to adistribution frame through a first switch, and the first switch iscontrolled by a control system. An interface is placed in proximity tothe distribution frame. The second local exchange carrier is connectedto the interface through a second switch. A connection from the firstswitch is overlapped to the distribution frame with the interface. Thesecond local exchange carrier requests the control system to disconnectthe first switch to thereby disconnect the first local exchange carrierfrom the distribution frame. The second local exchange carrier connectsthe interface to thereby connect the second local exchange carrier tothe distribution frame.

According to a feature of the above embodiment, the second localexchange carrier confirms that the interface and second switch areproperly connected with the distribution frame and subscriber'sequipment attached thereto.

According to another feature of the above embodiment, the second localexchange carrier requests the control system to reconnect the firstswitch to the distribution frame in response to failure duringconfirmation of at least one of the interface and second switch toproperly connect with the distribution frame.

According to yet another feature of the above embodiment, the requestincludes the second local exchange carrier providing at least one codeto the control system, including at least an authorization code,checking whether the first switch and the distribution frame areconnected; and disconnecting the first switch when the checkingindicates that the first switch is connected to the distribution frame.

According to still another feature of the above embodiment, theconnection between the first switch and the distribution frame isremoved.

According to another embodiment of the invention, there is provided amethod for transferring service of a distribution frame from a firstswitch of a first local exchange carrier to a second switch of a secondlocal exchange carrier, where connections from the first switch, and aninterface connected to the second switch, overlap into a common jack ofthe distribution frame. The second local exchange carrier contacts acontrol system which controls the first switch. The control systemrequests at least one code. The second local exchange carrier providesthe at least one code. The control system checks the at least one codeand permits further operations if the at least one code is valid. Thecontrol system checks to determine a status of the first switch. Thecontrol system disconnects the first switch if the first switch isconnected to the distribution frame, whereupon the second local exchangecarrier connects the interface to the distribution frame. The controlsystem connects the first switch to the distribution frame if the firstswitch is disconnected from the distribution frame.

According to a feature of the above embodiment, connections between thefirst switch and at least the common jack are removed.

According to another feature of the above embodiment, if the firstswitch is disconnected, the second local exchange carrier disconnects atleast one of the interface and the second switch before the controlsystem connects the first switch.

According to yet another embodiment of the invention, a system fortransferring service between first and second local exchange carriers isprovided, and includes a distribution frame. A first switch is connectedto the first local exchange carrier and a second switch is connected tothe second local exchange carrier. The first switch is connected to acommon connector of the distribution frame, and the second switch isconnected to the common connector through an interface. A controlmechanism controls the first switch, and includes a mechanism for one ofdisconnecting and connecting the first switch in response to a requestfrom the second local exchange carrier. The second local exchangecarrier includes a connecting mechanism which connects the second switchto the distribution frame through the interface in response to the firstswitch being disconnected, and which disconnects at least one of theinterface and the second switch before the control means connects thefirst switch.

According to a feature of the above embodiment, the control mechanismincludes a mechanism which receives an authorization code from thesecond local exchange carrier to permit the second local exchangecarrier access to the mechanism for one of disconnecting and connecting.

According to a feature of each of the above embodiments, the controlmechanism/system includes an interactive voice response system tointerface with the second local exchange carrier.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is further described in the detailed descriptionwhich follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way ofnon-limiting examples of preferred embodiments of the present invention,in which like reference numerals represent similar parts through theseveral views of the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a local loop at a selling LEC's centraloffice;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the connections set up by a purchasingLEC before transfer of service;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the connections of FIG. 2 after serviceis transferred;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a preferred embodiment of theinvention;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the preferred call flow diagram to transferservice between LECs; and

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

A schematic diagram of the configuration of the system to effect LECtransfer according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 4. As showntherein, a purchasing LEC installs a remote purchasing LEC switch 130,and a purchasing LEC interface 104 at a selling LEC central office 100.Switch 130 is connected to the purchasing LEC operation system station(OSS) 102. Following installation, a frame attendant for the selling LEC“half-taps” the purchasing LEC interface 104 with the connection from aselling LEC switch 106 into the same connector jack 110 of the cable andpair side of an DF 108, i.e., cross connects 120 and 122 from bothselling LEC switch 106 and purchasing LEC interface 104 overlap andconnect with the same terminals of jack 110. In the alternative, thepurchasing LEC can “half-tap” cross connects 120 and 122 during theinitial installation of interface 104.

Before transfer, purchasing LEC switch 130 (and/or interface 104) isinactive. Thus, although both switch 106 and interface 104 physicallyconnect to the same terminals of jack 110, the subscriber's telephoneequipment only remains in active communication with selling LEC switch106.

When the purchasing LEC OSS 102 is ready to commence transfer, itcontacts a selling LEC OSS 112, which controls selling LEC switch 106,over an appropriate medium (e.g., telephone, direct connection,Internet, intranet, etc.) to issue an appropriate deactivation request.Selling LEC OSS 112 responds by disconnected selling LEC switch 106 fromDF 108 (e.g., turning selling LEC switch 106 OFF, disabling acommunication relay, etc.).

The purchasing LEC then issues an appropriate activation command toconnect purchasing LEC switch 130 (e.g., turn switch 130 or interface104 ON, activate an appropriate relay, etc.). Staff at the purchasingLEC then initiate the necessary work and tests to confirm a properconnection with DF 108 and the subscriber's telephone equipment.

If complications prevent the purchasing LEC from establishing a properconnection within the allocated time period, then purchasing LECdisconnects purchasing LEC switch 130 and/or purchasing interface 104,and requests selling LEC OSS 112 to reconnect selling LEC switch 106.Purchasing LEC can then attempt to correct the problem and reestablish aproper connection at its convenience.

Once the connection is established, the “dead” connections betweenselling LEC switch 106 and DF 108 can be removed by a frame attendant athis convenience.

As can be seen by the above, the purchasing LEC can connect with DF 108of a selling LEC without the presence of a frame attendant. By placingthe purchasing LEC in total control of the transfer of service, the needfor coordinating phone calls and/or to schedule personnel is eliminated.Since the frame attendant can make any necessary connections and/orremove wires collaterally with other services at DF 108, the costsassociated with this specialized service of the frame attendant areeliminated. Further, the purchasing LEC does not need to continuallyschedule transfer times to try to overcome complications in previousattempts to establish a proper connection. Thus, not only does thetransfer process take less time, the costs associated with the frameattendant are substantially reduced.

Although many ways exist for purchasing LEC OSS 102 to communicate withselling LEC OSS 112, a preferred interactive voice response system witha graphical user interface set up by the selling LEC is shown in FIG. 5.At step S2, the system provides a greeting to confirm that thepurchasing LEC has connected with selling LEC OSS 112. The system thenrequests entry of an identification code at step S4, which is checked atstep S6. If the code is invalid, then control returns to step S4 torequest a different code. If desired, the system may provide an“incorrect access code” message, and/or cut the user off if a correctcode is not entered within a certain number of attempts.

If the code is valid, then the system requests a purchase code, whichcorresponds to the particular transfer and/or time for transfer, at stepS8. The code is checked at step S10. If the code is invalid, thencontrol returns to step S8 to request a different code. If desired, thesystem may provide an “incorrect purchasing code” message, and/or cutthe user off if a correct code is not entered within a certain number ofattempts.

If the purchase code is accurate, then the system requests confirmationto proceed at step S12. This is primarily a customer service break, inthat it provides a convenient step for the purchasing LEC to obtaininformation about the subscribers that the service transfer will affect,or to abort the process. If the purchasing LEC elects to proceed withthe transfer, then control passes to step S14 to determine whetherselling LEC switch 106 is connected or disconnected to DF 108.

If connected, then selling LEC OSS 112 initiates the necessaryprocedures to disconnect selling LEC switch 106 at step S16. The systemprovides a message saying that disconnection is in progress (orcomplete) at step S18. A closing “thank you” message is provided at stepS20.

If disconnected (typically only if the purchasing LEC previouslydisconnected the switch), then the system indicates that the switch isdisconnected at step S22, and requests authorization to reconnect theswitch at step 24. If reconnection is authorized, selling LEC OSS 112then initiates the necessary procedures to reconnect selling LEC switch106 at step S26. The system provides a message saying that re-connectionis in progress (or complete) at step S28, followed by the closingmessage at step S20.

Although not detailed herein, each of the above steps may provideadditional customer service options, including returning to a main menuor requesting to speak to a customer service representative.

By proceeding through the above steps S2-S20, a purchasing LEC cantransfer service with minimal interaction with employees of the sellingLEC and/or with a frame attendant. If the transfer is initiallyunsuccessful, then the purchasing LEC OSS 102 can relink with theselling LEC OSS 112 to execute steps S2-S14 and S22-S28 to returncontrol to the selling LEC until the problem is corrected, again withminimal interaction with employees of the selling LEC and/or a frameattendant.

In the above embodiment, the half-tap is positioned through crossconnects 120 and 122 to connection jack 110 on the cable and pair sideof DF 108. However, other orientations of the half-tap upstream fromconnection jack 110 are possible. For example, as shown in FIG. 6, thewires can overlap at the office equipment DF 108, thus only requiring asingle wire on the cable and pair side.

While the invention has been described with reference to severalexemplary embodiments, it is understood that the words which have beenused herein are words of description and illustration, rather than wordsof limitations. Changes may be made, within the purview of the pendingclaims, without effecting the scope and spirit of the invention and itsaspects. While the invention has been described here with reference toparticular means, materials and embodiments, the invention is notintended to be limited to the particular disclosed herein; rather, theinvention extends to all functionally equivalent structures, methods anduses, such at all within the scope of the appended claims.

By way of non-limiting example, a purchasing LEC can stay connected withthe selling LEC at step S18 until transfer is confirmed; if a properconnection cannot be established, then the purchasing LEC can return tosteps S4 or S8 to initiate a re-connection procedure. Similarly, apurchasing LEC can stay connected with the selling LEC OSS 112 at stepS26 until any complications are overcome, and then return to steps S4 orS8 to restart the transfer.

Further, modifications to the above protocols, and the software/hardwarefor carrying out the same, are well within the skill in the art and fallwithin the scope and spirit of the present invention.

Still further, the automated protocol of the preferred embodiment isinteractive voice response, in which the system provides audio messagesto the second local exchange carrier and information (e.g., codes,option selection) is entered by telephone keypad. However, the systemmay also be computer based, in which the messages and/or options aredisplayed on a monitor and information is entered through an computerperipheral, e.g., keyboard and/or mouse.

1. A method for transferring service between local exchange carriers,comprising: connecting a second local exchange carrier switch to a firstlocal exchange carrier distribution frame while a first local exchangecarrier switch is connected to the first local exchange carrierdistribution frame; and initiating a disconnection of the first localexchange carrier switch from the first local exchange carrierdistribution frame.
 2. The method of claim 1, the connecting comprisingconnecting the second local exchange carrier switch to an interface thatis physically connected to the first local exchange carrier distributionframe.
 3. The method of claim 2, the physical connection between theinterface and the first local exchange carrier distribution framecomprising a first cross connect and the connection between the firstlocal exchange carrier switch and the first local exchange carrierdistribution frame comprising a second cross connect.
 4. The method ofclaim 2, further comprising activating the connection of the secondlocal exchange carrier switch to the interface.
 5. The method of claim2, wherein the first local exchange carrier switch and the interface areeach simultaneously physically connected to at least one common terminalof the first local exchange carrier distribution frame
 6. The method ofclaim 5, wherein the first local exchange carrier switch and theinterface are each simultaneously connected to at least one commonterminal of a jack of the first local exchange carrier distributionframe.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising activating theconnection of the second local exchange carrier switch to the firstlocal exchange carrier distribution frame.
 8. The method of claim 1,further comprising requesting re-connection of the first local exchangecarrier switch to the first local exchange carrier distribution frame inresponse to determining that the second local exchange carrier switch isnot properly connected with the first local exchange carrierdistribution frame.
 9. The method of claim 1, the initiating comprisingforwarding a request, including at least one authorization code, toremotely disconnect the first local exchange carrier switch from thefirst local exchange carrier distribution frame.
 10. The method of claim1, wherein a first side of the first local exchange carrier distributionframe further comprises a cable and pair side, and wherein a second sideof the first local exchange carrier distribution frame further comprisesan office equipment side.
 11. A system for transferring service betweenlocal exchange carriers, comprising: a second local exchange carrierswitch that connects to a first local exchange carrier distributionframe while a first local exchange carrier switch is connected to thefirst local exchange carrier distribution frame; and a second localexchange carrier operation station that is used to remotely requestdisconnection of the first local exchange carrier switch from the firstlocal exchange carrier distribution frame.
 12. The system of claim 11,further comprising an interface that is connected to the second localexchange carrier switch and that is physically connected to the firstlocal exchange carrier distribution frame.
 13. The system of claim 12,the physical connection between the interface and the first localexchange carrier distribution frame comprising a first cross connect andthe connection between the first local exchange carrier switch and thefirst local exchange carrier distribution frame comprising a secondcross connect.
 14. The system of claim 12, the second local exchangecarrier operation station forwarding an authorization code to remotelyrequest disconnection of the first local exchange carrier switch fromthe first local exchange carrier distribution frame.
 15. The system ofclaim 12, wherein the first local exchange carrier switch and theinterface are each simultaneously physically connected to at least onecommon terminal of the first local exchange carrier distribution frame.16. The system of claim 15, wherein the first local exchange carrierswitch and the interface are each simultaneously connected to at leastone common terminal of a jack of the first local exchange carrierdistribution frame.
 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the commonterminal is on an office equipment side of the first local exchangecarrier distribution frame.
 18. The system of claim 15, wherein thecommon terminal is on a cable and pair side of the first local exchangecarrier distribution frame.
 19. The system of claim 11, in which thesecond local exchange carrier operation station requests disconnectionof the first local exchange carrier switch by forwarding a request to afirst local exchange carrier operation station.
 20. The system of claim11, in which the second local exchange carrier operation stationrequests disconnection of the first local exchange carrier switch byinteracting with a first local exchange carrier interactive voiceresponse system.